What is the opposite of ethnocentrism quizlet?
What is the opposite of ethnocentrism quizlet?
xenocentrism
What is cultural relativism answers?
Cultural relativism is the view that virtually any feature, custom, or behavior of any given culture is neither better nor worse than that of any culture.
Is cultural relativism ethical?
CULTURAL RELATIVISM: the view that ethical and social standards reflect the cultural context from which they are derived. Cultural relativism should not be confused with moral relativism, which holds that moral absolutes guiding individual behavior do not exist as a matter of principle.
What are the problems with ethical relativism?
The disadvantage of ethical relativism is that truth, right and wrong, and justice are all relative. Just because a group of people think that something is right does not make it so. Slavery is a good example of this.
What is the difference between ethical and cultural relativism?
To expand, cultural relativism holds that what one culture believes is immoral, another culture may believe is moral (Vasquez). In essence, cultural relativism is the view that morality is culture dependent. Ethical relativism denies the existence of a one universal moral law.
What is the difference between ethnocentrism and cultural relativism?
The perspective of ethnocentrism addresses foreign peoples from the standpoint of the superiority of the observer’s culture, including values, religion, and symbols. Cultural relativism addresses other people in light of those people’s culture.
How does cultural relativism affect human rights?
Cultural relativism seems to not only ignore human rights violations, but actually seems to approve them. Furthermore, it hardly disapproves any cultural or religious practices. Cultural relativism ignores the necessity to oppose violations and other human rights, and also ignores the freedom of choice to do so.
What is the opposite of cultural relativism?
The opposite of ethnocentrism is cultural relativism, which means to understand a different culture in its own terms without subjective judgments. The term “ethnocentrism” was first applied in the social sciences by American sociologist William G. Sumner.
Are human rights universal issue of cultural relativism?
Therefore human rights cannot be truly universal unless they are not bound to cultural decisions that are often not made unanimously, and thus cannot represent every individual that these rights apply to. Universalism is used by many Western states to negate the validity of more ‘traditional’ systems of law.
What is relativism in human rights?
For the purposes of the debate about international human rights, Téson defines cultural relativism as the following: “the position according to which local cultural traditions (including religious, political, and legal practices) properly determine the existence and scope of civil and political rights enjoyed by …
What makes an action right for someone is that it is approved by that person?
What makes an action right is that one approves of it. According to this view, morality is a matter of personal preference. When we say that an action is right, we are merely saying that we approve of it.
Are human rights really universal?
Human rights are universal and inalienable; indivisible; interdependent and interrelated. They are universal because everyone is born with and possesses the same rights, regardless of where they live, their gender or race, or their religious, cultural or ethnic background.